Planned Unit Development Local Law Hearing Continues 1/15/25


This new local law is essentially the same as the one passed in March of 2024 to enable the Millers Pond development of 637 dwellings plus commercial uses on the old Minisceongo Golf Course on Pomona Road enabling a change in zoning from 1/2 dwelling per net acre to 5 dwellings per gross acre leaving to the clustering of new homes on the buildable areas of the land at densities comparable to the highest densities in Ramapo – for example Phase 1 which includes 12.72 acres is slated to have 244 units which is 16.25 units/acre and Phase 4 on 8 acres is planned for 64 units -11.07/acre. (See the latest on Millers Pond.)

Links for more information:

As of Friday January 11, 2025 ROSA has not been able to get any additiona information on this new local law. The Rockland County Planning Department is supposed to post a GML Review letter on Monday 1/13/2025.

When?

  • January 15, 2025 at 7:00 pm

Where?

  • Town of Ramapo Town Hall – 237 Rt 59

If you live near any land that is current 10+ acres in size whether developed or vacant, it is possible that it could be redeveloped under this new local law. Please come out and tell the Town Board what rules you need to ensure is in place to protect you from impacts of a change in zoning – for example required conservation easements, maximum building height, maximum density, restricting changes to traffic, etc.

If you cannot attend the public hearing but wish to make your opinion known send an email to the Town Clerk osherovitzs@ramapo.org with subject line “Comments for PUD Local Law Hearing”.

, , ,

One response to “Planned Unit Development Local Law Hearing Continues 1/15/25”

  1. How can Board Members even consider changes to zoning laws WITHOUT a Comprehensive Plan in place. This is putting the cart before the horse. Hasn’t anyone learned ANYTHING from the town of South Blooming Grove?! Just ONE county over they are TRUCKIN IN WATER at the property owners’ expense due to OVERDEVELOPMENT. The infrastructure can only supply water for HALF the population. Are the Board Members trying to tell constituents that HAPHAZARD development (because WITHOUT a comprehensive plan that is what it is) without regard to environmental/residential/infrastructure issues will be GOOD for the area? LAUGHABLE.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *